Janet wrote: I don't know who wrote the piece Roy posted and I can't comment on it except to say that it doesn't correspond with my understanding of the purpose of the meeting. It also doesn't mention the approximately 20 other clubs who attended. Certainly their idea of 'confidential' and then having it publicly posted on the internet wouldn't fit with my definition. I'm aware that no-one will believe me, but no changes have been made, no decisions for any changes have been made, and no proposal for any changes have been made
Janet the piece came straight from the minutes of a VMCC meeting so was clearly written by them.
What you have written is the whole point. What we're being told by our chairman (almost nothing) clearly does not correlate to what's been written by the VMCC. I'm well aware that no official action was or has been taken, nor am I against meetings taking place between clubs subject to the matter. However once they have taken place it should surely be stated clearly and precisely in the Jampot what the purpose was and the outcome from our point as a club.
No ill feeling from this end merely a concern about the club losing it's independence and identity, as for the new kid on the block, hardly, he's been on the national committee for years!